[LUGOS-SLO] kako izgleda polglasnik v small-caps varianti?

[Mojca Miklavec]

Pozdravljeni,

Imam eno nenavadno vprasanje. Prosila sem Poljake, ce lahko vkljucijo
polglasnik v repertoar znakov v svojih pisavah (Latin Modern in ostale
"TeX" pisave), zdaj pa so me vprasali, kako naj izgleda small caps
varianta. Najbolje, kar jim znam odgovoriti, je, da se polglasnik kot
small caps najbrz nikoli ne uporablja, ampak ce jim je ze vseeno, ce
spotoma dodajo se kaksno crko vec ... pozna kdo odgovor? (Bojim se, da
bi bil prej podoben povecanemu polglasniku kot pa obrnjenemu e-ju,
ampak iskreno povedano nimam pojma.)

Hvala,
   Mojca


> As you know, there is not capital eturned; according to Unicode
> http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/opentype/glyphlist.txt
> the glyph U+018E can be used in both roles:
> 018E;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER REVERSED E;Lu;0;L;;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER TURNED E;;;01DD;
>
> Not nice, but one can live with this.
>
> The problem is actually with schwa. Its capital form,
> 018F;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCHWA;Lu;0;L;;;;;N;;;;0259;
> according to http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/018F/index.htm
> should look like an enlarged rotated letter `e'. Since I have no idea how
> to design such a glyph correctly, I haven't included capital Schwa into
> the repertoire of LMs...
>
> Eventually, two questions:
>
> 1. Can the capital Schwa be needed in actual applications?
> 2. What the small schwa should look like in small cap fonts?
>     Can it be just rotated e.sc (i.e., diminished capital E turned)?